2015.07.30 Blog Summarizes MS Law and Seminal Decision. See this blog for discussion that begins with the following heads-up quoted here from the blog:
2011 Noncompetition Agreement Upheld -- "Since we find that a nationwide geographic restriction would have reasonably protected Timber Lake’s interests, we cannot say that Timber Lake’s effort to balance [the defendant’s] interest by reducing that restriction to within a 250-mile radius of Tupelo was unreasonable." (Timber Lake Foods Inc. v. Stephanie Estess, case number 2009-CA-000980, MS Court of Appeals, 2011.3.9)
Copyright © Joseph Poerio. All rights reserved.